How Cleveland Vibrator Company Turned Two Years of Underutilized HubSpot Into a Sales System Their Reps Actually Use
For the first time in their history, Bunting's leadership can identify which marketing efforts and which sales reps are driving pipeline and revenue — including a tradeshow attribution model that's reshaping how the company plans its event spend.
Time to first results: Within 90 days of go-live, after a 12-month phased build.
At a Glance
| Industry | Industrial Manufacturing — pneumatic and electric vibrators, vibratory equipment and systems |
| Company size | 50+ employees, $50M+ revenue |
| HQ / Geography | Cleveland, Ohio |
| Founded | 1923 |
| Business Units | Cleveland Vibrator, HK Technologies, FastFeed Corporation |
| Engagement type | HubSpot Sales Hub Implementation |
| Project duration | 90 days |
| Time to First Results | 30 days |
| Adjacent systems | ERP (pricing, lead time, order entry), PandaDoc (ETO formal quotes), Outlook (HubSpot Sales Add-in) |
| Modgility team | HubSpot Implementation Specialist |
Customer Info
Cleveland Vibrator Company has been solving material flow challenges with vibration since 1923. Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, the company designs and manufactures pneumatic and electric industrial vibrators and vibratory equipment — serving customers across mining, recycling, aggregate, pharmaceutical, plastics, manufacturing, foundry, and feed and grain. With more than 100 years of engineering experience, Cleveland Vibrator has worked with over 15,000 companies worldwide. Today the company operates as part of the Industrial Vibration Collective (IVC) alongside two affiliated businesses: HK Technologies (fine mesh screening and sieving equipment) and FastFeed Corporation (vibratory feeding systems and automation). Across the three business units, seven sales representatives serve customers from Cleveland, Salem, and remote locations.
Overview
Cleveland Vibrator had been a HubSpot customer for two years when they came to Modgility. The system was in place, but it wasn’t working. Reps were not using templates or sequences. Tasks were not being completed. Leads were coming in from the website and landing without a clear owner or a structured next step. Leadership had no view into rep activity, pipeline by product type, or how fast the team was responding to inbound inquiries.
The core problem was not the team or the software — it was the architecture. HubSpot had been configured for marketing use but not built for how a multi-business-unit industrial sales team actually operates. Cleveland Vibrator’s sales motion involves two fundamentally different types of deals: off-the-shelf Make-to-Stock (MTS) products with short sales cycles, and custom Engineer-to-Order (ETO) solutions with long cycles and multiple decision-makers. Both were going through the same pipeline, which made forecasting and follow-up discipline nearly impossible.
Modgility optimized the HubSpot Sales Hub from the ground up in 90 days — two distinct pipelines, automated lead assignment and follow-up workflows, sequenced outreach tied to deal type, task automation to enforce follow-up cadence, and a nurture program designed to keep ETO prospects engaged through a multi-month evaluation cycle. Within 30 days of go-live, the team was working leads in a way they had never done before.
“We had been using HubSpot for a few years but knew we needed to take it to the next level to get more out of the software. Hunter helped our team clean up and organize our existing datasets to enable sequence and workflow automations plus make improvements with our website forms to increase lead submissions. We would recommend Modgility to others to improve their use and functionality with HubSpot! ”
VP of Sales, Cleveland Vibrator Company
The Challenges
1. Two completely different sales cycles were being managed in one pipeline
- The Situation: MTS deals — standard vibrators and off-the-shelf equipment — close in days or weeks. ETO deals — custom-engineered solutions for specific industrial applications — can take months. Both were flowing through the same deal pipeline with the same stages, the same follow-up expectations, and the same reporting.
- Why It Mattered: A single pipeline made it impossible to forecast by product type. Leadership couldn’t tell whether a stalled deal was a slow-closing MTS quote or a healthy ETO opportunity in evaluation. Pipeline reviews were guesswork.
- The Opportunity: Separating the two deal types into dedicated pipelines — with stages and sequences appropriate to each — would let leadership forecast by revenue type and give reps a clear process to follow based on what they were actually selling.
2. Leads were arriving but not being assigned or followed up consistently
- The Situation: Website form submissions were going to a shared sales inbox. There was no automated routing, no system for reps to claim a lead, and no workflow to enforce a first follow-up.
- Why It Mattered: The company’s website was generating inbound interest, but the time between a lead submitting a form and receiving a human response had no floor. Speed-to-lead was entirely dependent on who happened to check the inbox.
- The Opportunity: An automated lead assignment process — tied to the Outlook HubSpot Sales Add-in, with clear lead status logic and dashboard visibility into unassigned and unworked leads — would give the team the structure to respond consistently.
3. Sales reps were not using HubSpot’s sales tools
- The Situation: Templates, sequences, tasks, meeting schedulers, and call logging were all available in HubSpot. None of them were being used. Reps were sending emails from Outlook without logging activity, making calls without recording outcomes, and tracking follow-ups in their heads.
- Why It Mattered: With minimal tasks completed across the entire team in the 30 days before the engagement, there was no follow-up infrastructure. Opportunities could have been lost not because reps weren’t trying — but because there was no system keeping them on cadence.
- The Opportunity: Building sequences designed for each deal type, automating task creation at the right moments in the sales process, and training the team on the tools that already existed would transform the system from a passive record-keeper into an active sales manager.
4. Long-cycle ETO deals had no nurture program to keep them warm
- The Situation: ETO deals can sit in the proposal stage for six months or more while a prospect evaluates custom solutions. During that time, the only communication happening was whatever a rep happened to send manually.
- Why It Mattered: Prospects evaluating a multi-thousand-dollar custom vibration solution over several months need consistent, relevant education to stay engaged. Without an automated nurture track, deals went cold because there was no scalable way for a small sales team to maintain meaningful contact.
- The Opportunity: An automated, product-family-specific nurture workflow — triggered when a deal enters the proposal stage — would send educational content for up to nine months without requiring rep intervention, keeping Cleveland Vibrator top of mind through the full evaluation cycle.
The Solution
The build was structured around one core insight: Cleveland Vibrator’s sales motion is not one process — it’s two. Everything else followed from that. Modgility’s first step was cleaning and organizing the existing contact and company data in HubSpot so that sequences, workflows, and automations could actually run against it. With the foundation corrected, the build proceeded in parallel across pipelines, workflows, and reporting
1. Two dedicated sales pipelines — MTS and ETO — with stages, sequences, and logic built for each
- The Move: Modgility built two distinct HubSpot deal pipelines: the CVC – MTS Pipeline for standard stock products, and the CVC – ETO Pipeline for custom-engineered solutions. Each pipeline has its own stage definitions, required deal properties (Product Family, Deal Type, Deal Lead Source), and downstream automation.
- How It Works: When a rep creates an MTS deal, they enter it at the Proposal/Price Quote stage after generating a quote from the ERP, then use the MTS sequence to send the quote via Outlook. Recurring MTS deals enter at Prospecting and use a separate recurring customer sequence. ETO deals enter at Budget, progress through a ballpark estimate stage before a PandaDoc formal quote is generated, and are automatically enrolled in the ETO nurture workflow when they reach Proposal/Price Quote.
- The Win: Leadership can now forecast by product type — MTS versus ETO — for the first time. Reps have a clear, stage-appropriate process to follow based on what they’re selling, and every deal carries the property data needed for meaningful reporting.
2. An automated lead assignment and follow-up system tied to the Outlook HubSpot Sales Add-in
- The Move: Modgility configured the website form submission flow to notify the shared sales@ inbox and automatically send an acknowledgment email to the lead with an invitation to provide additional project detail. Reps claim leads by emailing from the Outlook HubSpot Sales Add-in, which logs the activity on the contact record and triggers lead status tracking.
- How It Works: When a rep responds to a lead via the Add-in, the contact’s lead status advances automatically. Three dashboard reports give visibility into what’s working and what’s falling through: CVC New Leads with No Sales Follow-up, CVC Working or Connected Leads with No Scheduled Sales Follow-up, and Unassigned Leads. Every open lead is expected to have at least one associated task with a follow-up due within three days.
- The Win: Leads no longer sit unworked in a shared inbox. Every inbound contact has a clear status, a clear owner, and a scheduled next step — or it shows up in a report that flags it for attention.
3. A structured lead qualification process with BANT capture and the Inquiry Sheet sequence
- The Move: Modgility built a BANT qualification section into the HubSpot Contact record and created the Inquiry Sheet sequence, which sends a structured inquiry form to leads and automatically timestamps the send date on the contact record.
- How It Works: When a rep follows up with a lead, they use the CVC Lead Follow-up template (via the Outlook Add-in) to send a personalized email with a HubSpot meeting scheduler link integrated with their Outlook calendar. If deeper qualification is needed, they enroll the lead in the Inquiry Sheet sequence, which attaches the inquiry form PDF and creates a task if no activity is logged within six months. Management can see Inquiry Sheet Sent Date for every contact in a single report.
- The Win: Qualification is no longer dependent on rep memory. Budget, pain points, current process, and timeline are captured in a structured field on the contact record, and leadership can see which leads have received an inquiry sheet and which have gone cold.
4. A product-family-specific ETO nurture workflow for long-cycle custom deals
- The Move: Modgility built an automated nurture workflow template that triggers when an ETO deal enters the Proposal/Price Quote stage and sends educational emails for six to nine months — one per month, organized by product family — to all contacts associated with the deal. The workflow unenrolls contacts automatically if the deal moves out of proposal stage.
- How It Works: Each product family (DC Vibrators, pneumatic vibrators, vibratory feeders, etc.) has its own workflow instance, populated with educational content such as YouTube application videos, industry trend content, case studies, and how-we-work pieces. Contacts do not need to be newsletter subscribers to receive nurture emails — these communications are sent under a legitimate business interest framework tied to their specific product inquiry.
- The Win: ETO prospects now receive consistent, relevant communication throughout a long evaluation cycle without any rep intervention. The sales team stays top of mind through months of consideration without burning rep time on manual follow-up.
5. A CVC Sales Dashboard with rep-level and pipeline-level visibility
- The Move: Modgility built a CVC Sales Dashboard with reports covering new leads, unassigned leads, leads being worked, deals created over time, and deal amount segmented by type and product family.
- How It Works: Leadership opens one dashboard and sees, by rep, which leads are unworked, which deals are in which stage, and how deal creation and deal amount are trending over time. Lead response time is now a tracked metric — visible per rep — where it did not exist as a measured number before the engagement.
- The Win: Leadership moved from intuition-based pipeline reviews to data-based ones. Rep performance conversations now start with the same numbers leadership and reps can both see.
The Impact
Within 30 days of go-live, Cleveland Vibrator’s sales team was operating in a way that hadn’t been possible before — not because the tools were new, but because the architecture finally matched how the team works.
$1.43M
ETO pipeline created
33x
Increase in tasks completed
53%
Reduction in avg lead response time
1. $1.43M in custom-engineered pipeline created in 30 days — in a pipeline that didn’t exist before
- What Changed: The ETO Pipeline was built from scratch during the engagement. Before Modgility, there was no dedicated structure for tracking custom-engineered deals separately from stock products.
- The Result: Within 30 days of launch, $1.43M in Engineer-to-Order deal value had been entered and was actively moving through a purpose-built pipeline. That’s not recovered pipeline — it’s pipeline that could not have been measured before.
2. Task completions increased 33x in the first 30 days
- What Changed: Automated workflows created tasks at the right moments in the sales process, and sequences tied to each deal type generated structured follow-up cadences for reps. The Tasks View Page gave reps a single interface to work through their daily queue.
- The Result: 67 tasks were completed in the 30 days after launch, compared to 2 in the 30 days prior. Follow-up is no longer an act of memory — it’s an act of completing what the system put in front of each rep.
3. Average lead response time dropped 53% across the sales team
- What Changed: Inbound leads now route to a structured assignment process. The Outlook HubSpot Sales Add-in logs activity directly to the contact record and advances lead status. Dashboard reports surface unresponded leads for immediate attention.
- The Result: Average lead response time across four tracked reps dropped from 16.2 to 7.6, a 53% reduction. The team is now reaching new leads in less than half the time they were before the engagement.
4. Leadership now has rep-level visibility into pipeline, activity, and lead response — for the first time
- What Changed: The CVC Sales Dashboard is live, pulling real data from a system that is now being used the way it was designed to be used.
- The Result: Coaching conversations, tradeshow planning decisions, and pipeline reviews can now start with data. The team knows which leads are unworked, which reps are behind on follow-up, and how deal creation is trending — without running a manual report.
What's Next
With the sales process now running on a consistent foundation, Cleveland Vibrator is positioned to layer in capabilities that weren’t viable before: tradeshow attribution reporting to measure deal creation and pipeline by event, additional product-family nurture workflows as content is developed, and deeper lead qualification segmentation as the team accumulates more data on which lead sources and product categories convert at the highest rate. The infrastructure is built — the next phase is using it to make sharper decisions.
Why This Engagement Matters for Companies Like Yours
Cleveland Vibrator’s situation is common among industrial manufacturers who adopted HubSpot during a period of rapid growth and configured it primarily for marketing use. The CRM is technically running. There’s deal data in it. Reps know how to log in. But the sales process isn’t actually living there — it’s living in email threads, Outlook calendars, and the heads of individual reps.
The fix is not more training on the same configuration. It’s rebuilding the architecture to reflect how the sales team actually operates — in this case, two completely different products with two completely different sales cycles, each requiring its own pipeline, its own sequence logic, and its own reporting. When the system matches the reality, adoption follows. When adoption follows, the numbers appear. A 33x increase in task completions and a 53% reduction in lead response time are not the result of motivation. They’re the result of a system that makes the right thing easier than the wrong thing.
Could This Be Your Story?
If your team has been on HubSpot for a year or more and the system is not driving consistent sales activity, the problem is almost certainly the architecture — not the software. The work begins with understanding how your sales motion actually operates and building the system around that reality.
Service that delivered this work: Multi-Hub HubSpot RevOps Implementation — Sales Hub + Marketing Hub + Service Hub
Learn more about HubSpot RevOpsOr start with the entry point that fits:
Sales Hub Implementation Marketing Hub Implementation Service Hub Implementation